Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘articles of note’ Category

It has come to my attention that some students don’t do all of their course readings. I don’t know what to say about this other than I’m completely taken aback by the concept. Luckily, (and the sarcasm stops here), we have Nancy Bunge to tell us how to work through this crisis of education. Make the texts harder!

A statistic is floating around that says that only 26 percent of students do their course readings and the basic argument that spawns from this is that we are living in a new age and today’s students don’t want to engage difficult texts when there are so many other shiny exciting ways to learn. With tools like Google and streaming media and all that jazz, who wants to curl up in a corner and read?

Nancy says that’s all bologne and I have to say I agree with her.

Here are a few choice quotes from her blog:

“My classroom experiences suggest that blaming university students for this depressing development makes little sense — and not only because faculty members have the power to challenge students’ self-destructive behavior. I’ve discovered that a sizable number of my students enjoy engaging hard books. When I ask them why, they give the reasons that researchers are beginning to validate: Students believe that complex reading nourishes their brains, and they find the experience satisfying. Or, as one of my students put it, “The books were tough but made me think.”

and:

“The students recognize the same thing as those who worry about the study by the National Endowment for the Arts documenting declining reading skills. Despite their affection for visual media and technology, my students realize that if they do not grapple with difficult, abstract texts, they will miss an important dimension of human learning and thinking. As one student wrote: “I like a challenge when I am trying to learn. Putting in more effort yields better results.”"

It’s not the quantity of the books that we read (although the more the merrier), but the quality of the book and the voracity with which we engage it. Only 26% of students do their course readings because only 26% of readings are of the level that they require close reading to understand the point and talk about them intelligently in class or in an essay.

I’ve been in courses that fail to teach me much because the readings were too easy. And to be fair I’ve also been in a course that fell apart because the readings were very difficult. However, I feel that the course failed because the students were not prepped appropriately. They assumed that it was going to be just another course that they could do a little bit of the reading an hour before class and coast on through. But by the time the students realized that these texts required a special level of engagement they had either soured on the course or were unable to catch up.

Another piece of advice that I have is to avoid easing students into difficult texts by progressing from easy texts to hard ones. Slam us right away with the hard ones so we can get a handle on the it while we are still figuring out how much energy we need to put into each course. Then you can ease up and let us apply the concepts to some more readable texts.

The moral of the story is that most students want to read difficult texts that change the way they see the world. Just be sure to wake them up when you assign one.

Am I wrong? Comment and let me know!

Read Full Post »

On Thursday, the Swedish Academy announced the 2008 winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature–Mr. Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio.  Yet, who is this mysterious (at least, in the annals of the collective American consciousness) J.M.G. Le Clézio?

According to the NY Times:

Mr. Le Clézio’s work defies easy characterization, but in more than 40 essays, novels and children’s books, he has written of exile and self-discovery, of cultural dislocation and globalization, of the clash between modern civilization and traditional cultures. Having lived and taught in many parts of the world, he writes as fluently about North African immigrants in France, native Indians in Mexico and islanders in the Indian Ocean as he does about his own past.

Mr. Le Clézio is not well known in the United States, where few of his books are available in translation, but he is considered a major figure in European literature and has long been mentioned as a possible laureate.

Sounds fancy and French.

Yet, as the article mentions, Mr. Le Clézio isn’t well known in the United States because we’re still in the 1700s and news and ideas just haven’t made it across the Atlantic Ocean.  Or, at least that’s what the Nobel Prize committee seems to think.

There were rumors floating around the internet that J.D. Salinger would be the next Nobel Prize laureate–the first American laureate since Toni Morrison’s win in 1993.  Yet, Horace Engdahl, the permanent secretary of the Swedish Academy, says that the US “is too isolated, too insular” and doesn’t really “participate in the big dialogue of literature.”  Maybe the Europeans are just to exclusive for us “Joe Six Pack” Americans.  What are your thoughts?

Read Full Post »

A recent article in the Chronicle of Higher Education covered the story of a business professor facing federal charges for intercepting the e-mail of a student he was having an intimate relationship with for over eight months. The student is also pursuing a civil suit against both the professor and the university. The university has suspended the professor until the matter is settled. This incident reminded me of another article I read at the Dankprofessor’s Blog in which he cited an incredibly provocative essay by feminist bell hooks on erotic student/faculty relationships.

It was interesting to me that almost all of the comments in the Chronicle article were directly opposed to the thesis of bell hooks’ essay. The very first comment by Susan set the tone:

“Okay, boys—I know you will disagree, but here goes: a professor ( in a position of power) should not be copulating with their students. This behavior costs organizations many millions of dollars each year. Look where it leads one—now poor Stephan Gladuwacked is going to do a little time away from the public. All because he couldn’t control himself and discern right from wrong. Leave your students alone, already. Go find someone your own age and quit with the pedophilic tendencies.”

The last sentence struck me as quite out of tune with the situation. I don’t think that “pedophilic tendancies” is appropriate for a situation involving a 27 year old graduate student and a man in his early 30′s. That aside though, her argument is probably the one held by the majority and is not out of touch with the reality of the perils of such a situation. However, bell hooks keeps whispering in my ear with statements like:

“The vast majority of women who are heterosexual in this society are likely to be in intimate relations with men at some point in their lives who have greater status and power, however relative, given the nature of capitalism and patriarchy. Clearly, it is more important to learn ways to be “just” in situations where there is a power imbalance, rather than to assume that exploitation and abuse are the “natural” outcome of all such encounters.”

and:

“Some folks oppose faculty/student erotic bonding because they say it creates a climate of favoritism that can be deeply disruptive. In actuality, any intimate bonding between a professor and a student is a potential context for favoritism, whether or not that intimacy is erotic. Favoritism often surfaces in the classroom and has nothing to do with desire.”

Her argument is much more complex than what I can copy and paste here, so I recommend following the link and reading her entire essay. When you finish with that, I want to know. Do you think it is okay for a university to prohibit faculty/student relationships? Or, is it something that should be discouraged, encouraged, or ignored?

Read Full Post »

I’m done with my thesis. Finally. 2 years of work, and 3 people (plus my parents and partner) will read it. Unless you, happy denizens, would like to experience me in all my Faulknerian glory….anyone? I thought not. :)

Anyway, since I just poured over 16,000 words on Faulkner out, I’m thinking about the meaning of those words. Does language matter? I hope so, because if it doesn’t, my language analyzing Faulkner’s language is going to be exceedingly irrelevant. But I think words do matter. Most of the controversies in the Democratic Primary have been linguistic in nature (rather than policy), particularly the recent, legitimate, I think, arguments over the use of the word “boy” to describe Barack Obama as well as Obama’s use of the words “bitter” and “cling”.

Another interesting example of the significance of language: Allah vs. God

Should we be debating policy instead of language? Is this semantics at its worst? Is this a ruse to hide the real issues, or are the words we use the real issues?

Read Full Post »

An article for you: The Examined Life

So, you get a chance to blog for a little. Comment, and tell me about what the PHIL program is like…I’ve heard it’s very logic/quantitative analysis based (not my thing), but I loved my Philosophy of the Environment Class.

Read Full Post »

for the lovelorn…

It’s Not You, It’s Your Books

Read Full Post »

natalie_bugsandangels1.jpg

I know, I’ve been a very bad blogger. No, it’s not senioritis; rather, senior year is killing me! But, I do have some goodies for you.

First off, English major or not, who can resist Victorian sex, discussions with Profs., and free pizza? Come to the EUA’s Movie Night showing Angels and Insects based on the A.S. Byatt novella which is in turn based on Jane Eyre. Monday March 24th, 6:30pm in 1120 Susquehanna.

And now for some light reading:

Another depressing little piece on literary studies.

And a British perspective

Which leads me to ask, where are all the public intellectuals? Do they have a place in our culture? I mean, honestly, isn’t that what all we aspiring academics want to be (the thought of writing a book to be read by maybe 15 people makes me want to die). Andrew Keen wrote a whole book on how the internet has created The Cult of the Amateur, and while it might be hypocritical of me to reference this book while I’m blogging sometimes it scares me. My partner, an artist whose primary medium is photography, tries not to kill people when they say “If only I had a camera like yours, I could be an artist”. Does a laptop an intellectual make? If I’m lucky this post will succeed in annoying digital humanists and luddites alike.

Enjoy the remnants of Spring Break.

Read Full Post »

First, I want to solicit impressions of World Wise. What did you all think? What worked and what didn’t? One of the impressions I have been getting was that the subject matter was HUGE and could have been taken in many different ways, so not everyone got their pressing questions answered (myself included!). That’s ok…this discussion should have a life beyond one panel anyway, and I want this to be one place in which that can happen.

One significant question that I wanted your take on was the question of whether or not multicultural education, understanding, and engagement necessarily breeds tolerance? I think the question who argued that it’s possible learning more about another group of people might strengthen animosity is possible…what do you think?

Also, I really really want to read the novel Nazi Literature in the Americas. As some of you know the EUA has a bookclub, and I would like to invite all of you to read this and then we’ll set up a discussion time some time after spring break. Note: YOU DON’T HAVE TO BE AN ENGLISH MAJOR TO PARTICIPATE. Read the book review…you’ll understand how it’s relevant to this blog. Any takers?

Read Full Post »

Check out this fascinating story on the future of women’s studies in the British academy (and here?). One of the things that I found most interesting is not only the discussion of what these developments mean for the future of feminism on campus but how they reflect a larger shift away from the arts and humanities and towards careerism. For more on that, also look over Can the Liberal Arts Be Saved?

On one hand, all this gloom and doom is nothing knew…contemplating the demise of the humanities seems as old as the humanities themselves. But what do you think?

Read Full Post »

Anyone want to come with me to Politics and Prose on Thursday night and hear Kwame Anthony Appiah talk about his new book?

What do you all think?

Also, check out this article about Robert Pinsky as a sort of “citizen-poet”.

Finally, don’t forget to come to the EUA’s first Coffeehouse of the semester, Wednesday at noon in 2123 Susquehanna. Email me for more info.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.